[dsdl-discuss] Re: Agenda for May

Murata-san

I agree that what we currently have is not ready for ballot. What I have
concern with is placing something on the Adenda for which there is no
documentation at all. Yes we will discuss Part 11, under Any Other Business,
but I am not happy with adding an agenda item for something which has no
document that can be reviewed meaningfully by national bodies.

Martin

----- Original Message -----
From: "MURATA Makoto" <murata@hokkaido.email.ne.jp>
To: <dsdl-discuss@dsdl.org>
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 6:20 AM
Subject: [dsdl-discuss] Re: Agenda for May

> I do not think that the files in the CVS repository are ready for the
> PDTR ballot right now. I am merely requesting discussion in the Seoul
> meeting. During the meeting, in my understanding, we can certainly
> develop a PDTR, probably by incorporating inputs from all the
> derivatives.
>
> I am skeptical about the idea of 100% sticking to the JTC1 procedure
> here. Practically, schemas and stylesheets are changed repeatedly and
> even weekly. I believe that the most reasonable way to create them in
> SC34 is informal development followed by official voting. There is
> nothing wrong in such informal development.
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> MURATA Makoto <murata@hokkaido.email.ne.jp>
>
>
> --
> DSDL members discussion list
>
> To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
> command "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
> (mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)
>
>

--
DSDL members discussion list
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)