[dsdl-discuss] Re: [Schematron-love-in] DSDL Part 5 (DTLL)

Re

> From the ISO DSDL part 5 ISO DTTL POV, I guess what we might be looking
> at is
> * The addition in part 10.3 of a new function, such as dt:validate(
> node(s), type) returning boolean
> Someone could have a better function name for this.
> * A 1-page normative annex, with 1 or 2 paragraphs, called "Using ISO
> DTTL with ISO Schematron"
> Saying "Use it as a function in assertion test only. Define
> namespace prefix in ns: elements. Assertion fails with error if function
> is not available from implementation. " and then example with XSD
> library and non XSD library.

I would prefer an annex, but please not ISO DTTL. Apart from the misspelling
of the acronym there is no context in Part 3 for Part 5. Spell it out:
"Using the ISO 19757 Datatype Language Library with Schematron" (Note my
deliberate dropping of ISO in front of Schematron: why should Part 5 only be
used in conjunction with ISO versions of Schematron?)

As to the function name why not dtll:check-datatype(node(s), type) ?

Martin

--
DSDL members discussion list
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)