[dsdl-discuss] Re: Some more errors in the RNC amendment(19757-2Amd 1)

Murata-san

I would suggest the wording is something like "Remove the duplicate entries
for:"

Without the numbers it is (deliberately) ambiguous whether this means remove
them from the original set or from the amendement.

Martin

----- Original Message -----
From: "MURATA Makoto" <murata@hokkaido.email.ne.jp>
To: <dsdl-discuss@dsdl.org>
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 9:43 AM
Subject: [dsdl-discuss] Re: Some more errors in the RNC amendment(19757-2Amd
1)

> Martin> I'm somewhat confused by:
> Martin>
> Martin> >2) Instruction of addition to the bibliography
> Martin> >Remove
> Martin>
> Martin> Am I presume that this means "As well as adding the entries in the
amendment
> Martin> also remove the existing entries"? If so, I would suggest that we
change the
> Martin> wording to read "In addition, remove the following entries from
the original
> Martin> bibliography"
>
> I do not quite understand how to write errata (editing instructions) for
> amendments, which are already editing instructions.
>
> The amendment says that five entries should be added. However, the
> fourth and fifth ones already exist in the original Part 2 (before
> the amendment). In other words, the amendment added unnecessary
> entries. So, we have to remove them.
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> MURATA Makoto <murata@hokkaido.email.ne.jp>
>
>
> --
> DSDL members discussion list
>
> To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
> command "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
> (mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)
>
>

--
DSDL members discussion list
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)