[dsdl-discuss] Re: Part 9 discussions in Seoul

Dear Murata-san

Thank you for forwarding these comments to the list. I am delighted that you
plan to participate in the Part 9 discussions, and I look forward to a
productive session on Wednesday.

Yours

Francis Cave
Editor, DSDL Part 9

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dsdl-discuss-bounce@dsdl.org
> [mailto:dsdl-discuss-bounce@dsdl.org]On Behalf Of MURATA Makoto
> Sent: 21 May 2006 12:53
> To: dsdl-discuss@dsdl.org
> Subject: [dsdl-discuss] Re: Part 9 discussions in Seoul
>
>
> I am happy to download Gizmo and Skype for my PC.
>
> FYI: The Japanese comments are as follows:
>
> 1. General
>
> Suppose that an instance and a DTD use different namespace prefixes but
> they are associated with the same namespace name. Then, is the document
> valid? If this is the case, how can Part9-aware DTD validators can
> interwork with Part9-unaware DTD validators? If this is not the case,
> how can Part 9 interwork with recent XML specifications?
>
> 2. Editorial
>
> Use IRIs rather than URIs.
> --
> MURATA Makoto <murata@hokkaido.email.ne.jp>
>
>
> --
> DSDL members discussion list
>
> To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
> command "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
> (mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)
>

--
DSDL members discussion list
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)