[dsdl-discuss] Re: Options re timetable

On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 11:31:48AM -0000, Alex Brown wrote:
> Martin, All,
>
> Might it not be more politic to ask them to cut us some slack? ... The
> fast tracking is only a contributory factor to the perceived slowness of
> standardisation. The real problem is that we're a small volunteer force,
> with other commitments. If OOXML was taken elsewhere, would it really
> allow us to keep to ISO's (probably unrealistic) schedule?

I think we shaold go thru each of our projects and see what we
can do to fulfill the requirements from ISO CS. It might not be so
difficult to comply to their requirements. I have been thru this process
for a couple of standards that I was project editor for, in SC22.

Anyway, if a project is cancelled, it is quite easy to start the project
anew, and from where we stopped, by issuing a new NP ballot with the
current working draft attached, possibly also for CD ballot.

best regards
keld

--
DSDL members discussion list
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)