[dsdl-discuss] Re: Schematron question: 5.4.6

> I think that " that is the name of a node" should be removed from this
> sentence and "is" should be replaced with "shall". This sentence is
> normative. And an informative note stating the intention (i.e., it
> should return the name of a node) should be added.

The problem of the current wording is that full-conformant
implementations are required to detect what cannot be easily detected.

In the conformance section, you wrote:

        A full-conformance implementation shall be able to determine for
        any XML document whether it is a correct schema.

That is, if a malicious schema specifies a name query that returns "$$$$",
full-conformance implementions must detect this error.

Cheers,

-- 
MURATA Makoto <murata@hokkaido.email.ne.jp>
--
DSDL members discussion list
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)