[dsdl-discuss] Re: ODF errata

From: MURATA Makoto <murata@hokkaido.email.ne.jp>
Date: Mon Feb 12 2007 - 14:29:05 UTC

> But I'm expecting 1.1 to be submitted by OASIS at that meeting. It will seem
> strange proposing an adendum to 1.0 and a new version at the same time! Any
> chance we can have an adendum out for email discussion during the summer?

Technical corrigenda require a SC34 ballot only. In other words, they
can be published by the end of this year. However, amendments take
time. We have to create a PDAM, FPDAM, and FDAM, and have to conduct
two SC34 ballots and one JTC1 ballot.

I believe that addendums CANNOT be handled by the PAS transposition
process. My understanding is based on 14.2 of the JTC1 directives
(http://www.jtc1sc34.org/repository/0719.pdf).

> These procedures apply to the transposition of PAS into international
> standards. Such a standard may be an IS (International Standard) or an
> ISP (International Standardized Profile). It is expected that these
> procedures will be used to process a broader class of documents from a
> more diverse set of sources than is currently served by the Fast Track
> process.

Cheers,

-- 
MURATA Makoto <murata@hokkaido.email.ne.jp>
--
DSDL members discussion list
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)
Received on Mon Feb 12 15:29:08 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Feb 12 2007 - 19:43:02 UTC