[dsdl-discuss] Re: Synchronization of the OASIS RELAX NGCompactSyntax and the ISO/IEC19757-2 AMENDMENT 1: Compact Syntax

On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 06:53:11PM -0000, Martin Bryan wrote:
> Keld
>
> Like ODF RELAX-NG is formally maintained by OASIS. In practice, as the OASIS
> TC chair is also an SC34/WG1 member, and the convenor of SC34/WG1 is an
> observing member of the TC, there is, in practice, a joint committee for its
> maintenance.

According to JTC 1 directives ISO standards need to be maintained by ISO.
I am just investigating how this can be done with a minimal fuzz from
our side. Looks like that is more or less done. But I think it would be
nice if other members of WG1 could also attend the OASIS meetings, and
that it be made formal. There should not be much to it.

Best regards
Keld

> Martin
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Keld Jørn Simonsen" <keld@rap.rap.dk>
> To: <dsdl-discuss@dsdl.org>
> Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2007 5:45 PM
> Subject: [dsdl-discuss] Re: Synchronization of the OASIS RELAX
> NGCompactSyntax and the ISO/IEC19757-2 AMENDMENT 1: Compact Syntax
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 12:03:46PM -0500, G. Ken Holman - ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC
> 34 Secretariat Manager wrote:
> > At 2007-02-18 13:39 +0100, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
> > >On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 01:48:14PM +0900, MURATA Makoto wrote:
> > >> > >Not sure. Need to ask Ken's advice on this. First task is to let
> > >Patrick
> > >> > >know them as he is already preparing a new edition.
> > >> >
> > >> > WG1 please. The plenary should be reserved for issues needing input
> > >> > or attention from all working groups.
> > >>
> > >> Ken,
> > >>
> > >> I now think that this is now an issue needing attention from all
> working
> > >> groups. That is, are we going to publish technical corrigenda for
> > >> International Standards, which came from OASIS or ECMA and are still
> > >> being extended?
> > >>
> > >> I need some technical corrigenda soon, since the JIS ODF has to be
> > >> compatible with the IS ODF. However, OASIS is preparing new versions
> > >> of ODF, which are likely to be proposed to SC34.
> > >
> > >Maybe we should make joint maintenance of both RELAX NG and ODF, so we
> > >avoid multiple unsyncronized versions of the two.
> >
> > In what ways are these two specifications synchronous?
>
> They are not. But each is to be maintained in two organizations, OASIS
> and ISO for ODF, and W3C and ISO for RELAX NG, and they should then each be
> maintained by a common group.
>
> For the SC34 part it could be a rapporteur group for each of the
> projects, having co-located meetings with the corresponding W3C
> or OASIS group.
>
> best regrads
> keld
> --
> DSDL members discussion list
>
> To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
> command "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
> (mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)
>
>
>
> --
> DSDL members discussion list
>
> To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
> command "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
> (mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)

--
DSDL members discussion list
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)