[dsdl-discuss] Re: Synchronization of the OASIS RELAXNGCompactSyntax and the ISO/IEC19757-2 AMENDMENT 1: Compact Syntax

Folks,

I do not think that "SC 34 should send its comments to OASIS and have
OASIS handle the defects" help. If it is argued that OASIS is "JTC 1
designated maintenance group of the submitter in accordance with JTC 1
rules", I would like to know when and how the decision was made. If
needed, I will ask Japanese JTC1 to raise this issue at JTC1.

In the case of ODF, the situation is a bit different from RELAX NG. Now
that they have created ODF 1.1, they might want to address this issue
in ODF 1.1 (or later) versions only and do not bother to
submit later versions to JTC1.

I do want the ISO ODF to be fixed. Even if the OASIS ODF is fixed, I will
have to ignore the fix when I create the JIS ODF.

> Martin Bryan wrote:
>
> > I'm happy to abide by the ISO secretariate ruling, but am not sure where it
> > leaves us with other OASIS originated standards such as RELAX NG. For
> > example, what happens if WG1 asks SC34 to submit a defect report to OASIS
> > and OASIS choose to ignore the reported defect?
>
> I agree that it will be good to know exact rules.
>
> OTOH, the question is rather academic as OASIS RELAX NG TC has 6 voting
> members and at least 3 from those people are also members of WG1
> (Makoto-san, Ken and me). So it is very unlikely that defect report will
> be ignored by OASIS.
>
> Jirka

Cheers,

-- 
MURATA Makoto <murata@hokkaido.email.ne.jp>
--
DSDL members discussion list
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)