Re: [dsdl-discuss] Re: Synchronization of theOASIS RELAXNGCompactSyntax and the ISO/IEC19757-2 AMENDMENT1: Compact Syntax

I wonder whether there is a need to have separate mechanisms for
translation corrigenda and other maintenance issues?

For example, to get a kind of reverse fast-track process by which issues
relating to unclear sentences and technical inconsistencies, but strictly
excluding addenda, general wordsmithing or anything that might require
implementations to be altered, can be dealt with. They agree to adopt our
corrections, strictly limited in scope, by default, to allow the standards
to keep in synch.

Addenda have to be a longer-cycle process than corrigenda.

The same issue would presumably come up with Ecma as well as OASIS specs.

Does anyone know if Korea or China has the same kind of issue wrt their
translation procedures? It seems an important issue.

Do JIS standards have any kind of "translators note" in which text needing
correction can be noted? That might be appropriate in the case of the
fast-track standards, in order to have any timeliness, perhaps?

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

MURATA Makoto said:
> Folks,
>
> I do not think that "SC 34 should send its comments to OASIS and have
> OASIS handle the defects" help. If it is argued that OASIS is "JTC 1
> designated maintenance group of the submitter in accordance with JTC 1
> rules", I would like to know when and how the decision was made. If
> needed, I will ask Japanese JTC1 to raise this issue at JTC1.
>
> In the case of ODF, the situation is a bit different from RELAX NG. Now
> that they have created ODF 1.1, they might want to address this issue
> in ODF 1.1 (or later) versions only and do not bother to
> submit later versions to JTC1.
>
> I do want the ISO ODF to be fixed. Even if the OASIS ODF is fixed, I will
> have to ignore the fix when I create the JIS ODF.
>
>
>> Martin Bryan wrote:
>>
>> > I'm happy to abide by the ISO secretariate ruling, but am not sure
>> where it
>> > leaves us with other OASIS originated standards such as RELAX NG. For
>> > example, what happens if WG1 asks SC34 to submit a defect report to
>> OASIS
>> > and OASIS choose to ignore the reported defect?
>>
>> I agree that it will be good to know exact rules.
>>
>> OTOH, the question is rather academic as OASIS RELAX NG TC has 6 voting
>> members and at least 3 from those people are also members of WG1
>> (Makoto-san, Ken and me). So it is very unlikely that defect report will
>> be ignored by OASIS.
>>
>> Jirka
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> MURATA Makoto <murata@hokkaido.email.ne.jp>
>
>
> --
> DSDL members discussion list
>
> To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
> command "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
> (mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)
>
>

--
DSDL members discussion list
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)