On 3/27/07, Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> wrote:
> Alex Brown wrote:
> > Rick
> >
> > [I'm posting this on behalf on Martin, who can't access this list while
> > in Oslo]
> >
> > At today's WG1 meeting we discussed your suggestions for adding
> > properties to Schematron.
> >
> > You raised the following open questions:
> >
> > 1. Should this be in the Schematron namespace, or is it a general enough
> > feature that other parts of DSDL can use it? I.e. is this a new annex,
> > a new content model, a TR or a new part? I think it might be neater to
> > contain it to just Schematron, and any other editor who wanted it can
> > clone it into their namespace.
> >
> > We agree that it would be neater to constrain it to just Schematron.
> >
> Good.
> > 2. Is this (schematron+property+some conventions) powerful enough to be
> > used as DSDL part 6 Path-based integrity constraints? I suspect not.
> >
> > We have come to the conclusion that if we could combine Schematron with
> > XPath 2.0 we would probably not need to have a Part 6 as this together
> > with the XProc language looks as if they may suffice to meet most of the
> > proposed use cases for Part 6.
> >
> Good.
> > At the last WG1 meeting you offered to "contact the STX (Streaming
> > Transformations for XML) developers to determine if they would be
> > willing to submit their work for standardization as Part 6 of DSDL." Did
> > you get any response from them? Mohamed Zergaoui, who joined us for the
> > first time this week, also proposed this as a possibility, suggesting we
> > add Streaming in front of the current name. He is in contact with the
> > STX developers through his work at W3C and will try to suggest the
> > possibility as well.
> >
> No response from the STX people I emailed, unfortunately. I am happy if
> someone else tries!
I'm actually in touch with STX people. Petr Cimprich seems to
appreciate to be involved in the DSDL work. Since STX people are going
to join XSL WG soon, we will have a clearer idea soon of the perimeter
of the work
> > We would like to suggest that a revised version of Part 3 be prepared to
> > include the additional properties that you are suggesting together with
> > a switch to using XPath 2.0 locations.
> Yes. There are also some improvements suggested by Japan, and some user
> feedback.
>
> There already is a "switch" to select XPath2 (the
> schema/@queryBinding="xslt2" attribute): the value is reserved already.
> However what is needed is a "Query Language Binding" for XSLT2 to say
> what this value means. The XSLT2 implementation is out now, and seems to
> work, so I don't see any technical problems.
What about Schema Aware version of XSLT 2 ?
>
> > If this idea is acceptable to
> > you, how soon would you be prepared to start work on this? (I need to
> > ensure that the necessary NWI is prepared, which should be submitted
> > with a CD draft that outlines where the changes would need to be made.
> >
> I would be happy to get a draft out by mid-May. Does that fit the timetable?
>
> Cheers
> Rick Jelliffe
>
> --
> DSDL members discussion list
>
> To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
> command "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
> (mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)
>
>
-- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 8 72 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 € -- DSDL members discussion list To unsubscribe, please send a message with the command "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org (mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)Received on Tue Mar 27 22:14:32 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 27 2007 - 21:53:02 UTC