Murata-san
What do you mean by:
>I would like to have the reference model (the 2-phase processing model)
in the body of this text.
It is in Clause 4, which is the body of the text. Do you mean you would
prefer it if it was at the start of Clause 5?
> It should make clear how entity mappings and
entity definitions are supported.
Again I am not sure what you mean by this. Entity name mappings are clearly
defined in:
"Change the names and, where appropriate, namespace prefixes, assigned to
nodes in the Infoset that identify "lements, attributes, entities or
processing instructions."
Admittedly I have not said anything about declaring entities, which I must
think about in the light of comments from Jirka and Mohamed.
Re:
>What about mapping elements to attributes and vice versa?
Mapping attributes to elements is included (using to-element) but the
reverse is not easy for anything other than the first child element or for
the contents of an element that is PCDATA only. As you cannot distinguish
whether or not there is only one PCDATA element or one child easily in these
cases I have ducked the reverse transformation.
Martin
PS: I will consider the other comments over the holiday weekend when I have
some spare time
Martin
-- DSDL members discussion list To unsubscribe, please send a message with the command "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org (mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)Received on Tue Apr 3 20:32:08 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Apr 04 2007 - 09:03:02 UTC