[dsdl-discuss] Re: Validation process (was: Re: Some thougts on Part10

Innovimax SARL wrote:

> With respect to part 10, we have to define a consistent way to call
> each validator component. I'm still unclear, if we need a polymorphic
> validator or as you proposed a specific-by-language one.
> How will you handle RelaxNG+Schematron or XMLSchema+Schematron ?

I think that in many cases using just NVDL is sufficient. You can
provide two validation actions for single element section.

> That's why I was asking for conditionnal validation

The question is whether it is better to handle it separately, or if
extend NVDL for such purposes. JNVDL already offers some extensions
which are going in this direction, see

http://jnvdl.sourceforge.net/#extension

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
  Jirka Kosek      e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz      http://xmlguru.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
       Professional XML consulting and training services
  DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
------------------------------------------------------------------
 OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO/JTC1/SC34 member
------------------------------------------------------------------
 Want to speak at XML Prague 2007 => http://xmlprague.cz/cfp.html

--
DSDL members discussion list
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)