[dsdl-discuss] Re: FDIS for Part 8

At 2007-04-24 19:01 +0100, Martin Bryan wrote:
>The text I am asking the committee's consideration to is what was
>added in response to ballot responses to comments made on the FCD by
>national bodies. As long as those at the meeting are happy that I
>have responded to the comments made correctly as far as I am
>concerned the ballot has been responded to correctly and we can
>proceed to the next stage, which is FDIS. My use of the word
>significant was only to draw people's attention to the one sentence
>that has been changed in the body of the text since the last draft,
>and to the note that has been copied out of a W3C spec to clarify this change.

Excellent ... thanks for the clarification. As long as this is the
changes that stabilize things, then I'll assume we can proceed. I
didn't infer that from your earlier note ... my mistake.

Please remember Directives 12.6.3.9 that lists what I need to receive
from you for submission.

Thanks, Martin!

. . . . . . . . . . Ken

--
G. Ken Holman                    Crane Softwrights Ltd.
ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 Secretariat  Standards Council of Canada
Committee correspondence:        mailto:jtc1sc34@scc.ca
Committee website:               http://www.jtc1sc34.org
Corporate correspondence:        mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com
Corporate website:               http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/a/
--
DSDL members discussion list
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)