[dsdl-discuss] Re: FDIS for Part 8

> The text I am asking the committee's consideration to is what was added
> in response to ballot responses to comments made on the FCD by national
> bodies. As long as those at the meeting are happy that I have responded
> to the comments made correctly as far as I am concerned the ballot has
> been responded to correctly and we can proceed to the next stage, which
> is FDIS. My use of the word significant was only to draw people's
> attention to the one sentence that has been changed in the body of the
> text since the last draft, and to the note that has been copied out of
> a W3C spec to clarify this change.

In Oslo, I was hoping that an upcoming draft addresses all my concerns.
Although I am happy to report that some of the concerns area addressed,
I am afraid that I see other issues. For example, I have just learned
that DSDL is limited to those XML parsers which emit DOM level 2 or 3,
perserve entity references, and provide replacement text for all entities.

I would suggest another FCD rather than a FDIS, which runs the risk
of unconditional no votes.

Regards,

-- 
MURATA Makoto <murata@hokkaido.email.ne.jp>
--
DSDL members discussion list
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)