Martin Bryan wrote:
> During discussions in 2006 it was decided that the role of Part 6 should
> be changed to be one that provided stream-based processing of XML files,
> but no user constraints were defined. Instead it was proposed that STX
> was a possible starting point to meet the requirements. Now we need to
> justify this change, and revise the requirements for Part 6 to cover the
> use cases that Rick and others envisaged for STX. Hence my call to all
> members of this discussion list to submit possible reasons for moving
> from path based constraints to a stream-based processing paradigm.
Martin, thanks from clarification.
As I see it is needed to put together requirements/use cases for
integrity constraints definition language. Ability to check for
constraints in a streaming mode could be one of such requirements and
later on we can decide whether other requirements are compatible with
streaming approach.
Jirka
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz http://xmlguru.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------ Professional XML consulting and training services DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing ------------------------------------------------------------------ OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member ------------------------------------------------------------------
-- DSDL members discussion list To unsubscribe, please send a message with the command "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org (mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Aug 23 2007 - 11:03:04 UTC