[dsdl-discuss] Re: Draft of DSDL Part 7 FCD

 
> On 10/17/07, MURATA Makoto <murata@hokkaido.email.ne.jp> wrote:
> > Dear colleagues,
> >
> > I am sorry for this late draft. Please let me know
> > if any of the dispositions in SC34 N0851. Other comments very
> > are welcome, but I retain the right to address them during
> > the next ballot.
> >
> > http://www.asahi-net.or.jp/~eb2m-mrt/dsdl/part7FCD.pdf
 
Looks very good. Well done.

s6.4: Does Unicode (character properties) need to be normatively
referenced? Also I think something like "exact repertoires of the
character classes" would be more precise than "semantics".

9. Conformance: I think the first sentence should be something like the
following:

"Different conformant CRDL processors may report different results only
if they have different resources or Unicode property tables available to
them."

Throughout: The use of the full name repertoire seems bloated. I would
prefer <see> instead of <ref> (Schematron uses @see) and <rep> or even
<char> instead of <repertoire>. This is cosmetic, not important.

Throughout: I would prefer not-in() to notin() but it is cosmetic, not
important. (Words joined together without some hyphen, space or case
change does not conform to English word formation rules, except for
time-honoured usages like wheelbarrow and ocassional Germanicisisms. It
seems unnecessary not to use normal word formation rules. Another choice
would be within() and without(). )

--
DSDL members discussion list
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)