[dsdl-discuss] Re: A revised draft for Part 7

> >
> > - <char> instead of <repertoire> for describing character classes
> >
> > - <repertoire> instead of <namedRepertoire> for describing repertoires
> > in registries. <repertoire> now has three attributes: "registry",
> > "name", and "number.
>
> Hmm, I am not sure why you did this change. Are they the same sort of
> data? The IANA charset registry is a registry of coded character sets.
> ISO 15897 registers both coded character sets and repertires (without
> encoding). We need to be consistent in our terms.

This is just a change of key words. Please read the revised spec.

> If the concepts are the same for "char" and "repertoire" then I would
> rather that they be one keyword, with optional attributes.
>
> > I am still not sure whether Unicode, IANA charset registry, ISO/IEC 15897 and
> > CEN ENV 12005 Cultural registry should be in the normative reference or
> > bibliography.
>
> Hmm, if you use them with the "repertoire" spec, I think they should be
> normative. I think you should not refer the CEN 12005 registry, as this
> has been taken over by ISO 15897. I think that Unicode has more or less
> depreciated their specs on this issue, but I am not sure.

Do you now think that the IANA charset registry can be normative?

Recently, ISO/IEC TR 14652:2004 was canceled. Since ISO/IEC 15897
has a similar history, I am not sure if ISO/IEC 15897 should be
referenced.

Unicode property lists are indespensable for the semantics of
regular expressions of W3C XML Schema Part 2.

Cheers,

-- 
MURATA Makoto <murata@hokkaido.email.ne.jp>
--
DSDL members discussion list
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)