[dsdl-discuss] Re: RELAX NG for OOXML

Jirka,

First, will you be in Geneva? I will be there.

I used the 2007 November version of the OOXML schema as a basis. It is
an interm version and is not publicly available. Since a new version is
expected to be announced to the public very soon, I would like to try
again using the new version as a basis and then publish the result as
part of the OOXML specification (should it become an ISO standard).

> Maybe few Schematron rules can be added to check those additional
> constrains and NVDL can be used to invoke validation both against RNG
> and Schematroin.

I have thought about embedding schematron as part of RNG but have not
thought about that possibility. Since xsi:schemaLocation has to be
removed, it does make sense to create such an NVDL schema. Let me
try if I can do that.

> It would be nice to see those requirements. It seems that I have to make
> sure I can attend Oslo meeting ;-)

There are two issues. One is multiple inclusion: when A and B includes
C, we cannot include A and B without errors). The other is conflicts of
named patterns: When both A and B have define foo=...., we cannot
include both A and B. I have avoided the first problem by using the
include statement only in the driver module, and the second problem by
attaching some prefixes to every defined names.

Cheers,

-- 
MURATA Makoto <murata@hokkaido.email.ne.jp>
--
DSDL members discussion list
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)