[dsdl-discuss] Re: FW: [office-comment] Ambiguity problems caused by a:defaultValue

> Am I wrong in thinking that you are all talking about the *implementation* !

Yes. We are talking about implementations of the DTD compatiblity spec.
However, six year experiences show that implementors do not implement
the modification of the infoset and that users do not rely on it.

>
> Isn't the declaration of ID simple enough to let the implemter do what
> he has to do ?

I don't understand what you are trying to do. Are you trying to extend
RNG or are you trying to revise the DTD compatibility spec? Or, are
you trying to create a new language for identity cosntraints?

Cheers,

-- 
MURATA Makoto <murata@hokkaido.email.ne.jp>
--
DSDL members discussion list
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)