On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Alex Brown<alexb_at_griffinbrown.co.uk> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> One item on the agenda for the Seattle meeting is ballot resolution for
> the FCD ballot for 19757-5.
>
> See document:
>
> http://www.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/sc34/def/1211.pdf (password protected) for
> the ballot result/comments.
>
> Please find attached a draft proposed disposition of comments as input
> to the WG deliberations.
>
> One issue in particular needs to be resolved, and it was raised (in
> different ways) by Japan, France and the UK: whether to move Part 5 from
> using XPath 1.0 to XPath 2.0. I am aware this has been discussed on our
> lists before, and I believe the overall mood is that we should move to
> XPath 2.0. Note that France has proposed dual profiles, whereby XPath
> 1.0 and/or XPath 2.0 could be chosen by implementers.
>
> Personally, I have no strong opinion either way. I do however have a
> lingering doubt about how many XPath 2.0 implementations there are --
> particularly F/OSS implementations that are really (as opposed to
> nearly) fit for use.
I see at least :
* SAXON-HE (ex Saxon B)
* eXist
* PsychoPath (which is integrated into Eclipse)
Mohaed
-- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 € -- DSDL members discussion list To unsubscribe, please send a message with the command "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request_at_dsdl.org (mailto:dsdl-discuss-request_at_dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)Received on Mon Aug 24 2009 - 19:13:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Aug 24 2009 - 18:23:02 UTC